Amazon
Showing posts with label Conspiracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Conspiracy. Show all posts
Tuesday, 13 January 2015
"Lord and Master of Everything"
Thursday, 8 January 2015
All Wars are Planned - the US Civil War
Monday, 5 January 2015
"If my sons did not want wars, there would be none."
Friday, 2 January 2015
The Illuminati and the French Revolution
Saturday, 27 December 2014
All Wars are Planned Part 2 - World War 1
All wars are planned and they are much loved by the banking community who can make big profits by lending money to both sides. The longer the wars last the more money they make and the loans are risk free because they are guaranteed by the government of a country. It doesn't matter who wins because the victors will always honour the debts of their opponents. The Rothchilds invented this system and have always been leaders of the international banking community
World War I was a good example of this system in operation and initially Germany had the upper hand because they had access to much greater finance (and thus greater resources) than France, Italy and Great Britain who were fighting alongside Russia. The Rothchilds did not want to support Russia because the Tsar and his family had repeatedly defied them and repeatedly refused to allow them to establish a Russian central bank.
A very significant event occurred in 1916 when Germany, although they were winning and not one foreign soldier had set foot on their soil, offered an armistice to Great Britain with no strings attached. The Rothschilds didn't want this to happen because they hadn't made enough money and wanted the war to continue. They were forced to play their trump card.
While the British government were considering Germany's offer a Rothschild agent called Louis Brandeis sent a delegation from the USA to Great Britain with a promise to bring the Americans into the war on the side of the British if they agreed to give Palestine to the Rothschilds. The Rothschilds had large business interests in the far east and needed their own state along with an army to use to deter any opponents in the region. Palestine was chosen
When the British agreed to the deal, all the major pro-German newspapers in the USA suddenly turned on Germany and ran propaganda pieces such as:
- German soldiers were killing Red Cross Nurses
- German soldiers were cutting off babies hands ....etc,
It was a blatant attempt by the Rothchild controlled press to manipulate American public opinion against the Germans despite the re-election campaign ran by President Woodrow Wilson in the same year under the slogan:
"Re-Elect The Man Who Will Keep Your Sons Out Of The War."
On December 12 1916, Germany formalised their offer of peace terms and the Rothschild war machine in the USA had to go up a few gears. Extensive propaganda was used to successfully turn public opinion against Germany and towards entering the war forcing re-elected President Wilson to renege on his promise. The USA entered World War 1 on April 6 1917.
The Rothschilds had kept their side of the bargain but needed something in writing from the British to prove they would keep theirs. Foreign Secretary, Arthur James Balfour wrote a letter dated November 2nd 1917 which is commonly known as the "Balfour Declaration"
Dear Lord Rothschild,
I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of His Majesty's Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet.
His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.
I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.
Yours sincerely,
Arthur James Balfour
The entrance of the USA tipped the balance, Germany were overwhelmed and World War 1 ended soon after. The Versailles Peace Conference was held in 1919 and it was agreed that Germany needed to pay reparations to the victors following their defeat. A Jewish delegation led by Bernard Baruch attended the conference and reminded them of the Palestine promise at which point the Germans realised why the USA had turned against them. The Germans, not unreasonably, felt they had been betrayed because at the time, Germany was the most Jew friendly country in the world. For example, the German Emancipation Edict (1822) guaranteed their civil rights and Germany was the only country in Europe which did not place restrictions upon them. It even gave them refuge in 1905 when they fled from Russia after the failure of the first attempted Communist coup.
The Rothschilds had kept their promise and Palestine was eventually confirmed as a Jewish homeland under British (controlled by the Rothchilds) control. At the time, less than one percent of the population of Palestine were Jewish and it is very interesting to note that the host of the Versailles Peace Conference was Baron Edmond de Rothschild.
The Versailles peace conference was also used, by the Rothschilds, as an attempt to set up another world government which was this time called the "League of Nations." It was ironically supposed to end all wars but fortunately it soon died because it was not accepted by enough countries.
Friday, 19 December 2014
The Independent Russian Bear
Russia has been in the spotlight recently with a big decline in the value of the rouble caused by the massive but mysterious fall in the price of oil. There has been speculation about this being a possible punishment for the Ukraine invasion and the refusal of Russian President Vladamir Putin to toe the line. He has expressed continued belligerence and stressed Russia's independence which is not the first time a Russian leader has behaved this way.
The Congress of Vienna took place in 1814 and 1815 and this did not go well for the Rothschild family. The intention was to create a form of world government and give them complete political control over much of the civilized world. Most of the European governments were in debt to the Rothschild family with their network of central banks and they intended to use this as a bargaining tool but Tsar Alexander I of Russia (who had not agreed to a Rothschild controlled central bank) would not cooperate and the Rothschild world government plan failed.
Nathan Mayer Rothschild was enraged by this and he swore that some day he (or his descendants) would destroy the entire family of Tsar Alexander I. He was true to his word and 102 years later, the Rothschild controlled Bolsheviks fulfilled that promise.
In 1863, President Abraham Lincoln discovered that Tsar Alexander II of Russia was still having problems with the Rothschild family as he was still refusing their continued attempts to set up a central bank in Russia. The Tsar helped President Lincoln by issuing orders that if either England or France intervened in the American Civil War to help the Confederates then Russia would consider it a declaration of war and intervene on the side of President Lincoln. To show his good faith he sent parts of his Pacific Fleet to both San Francisco and New York.
The feud continued and the Rothschild family gathered a group of Jewish spies and sent them to Russia to instigate a revolution for the benefit of the working man. In reality, this was a takeover of Russia by a Rothschild controlled elite. These Jewish spies were given Russian names e.g. Trotsky was originally called Bronstein and the groups were sent to areas throughout Russia to incite riots and cause rebellion.
They developed into the Bolsheviks and they eventually engineered a revolution. Tsar Nicolas II abdicated on March 2 1917 and the Rothschild family ordered his execution along with his entire family both to get control of the country and as an act of revenge.
The promise made by Nathan Mayer Rothschild in 1815 was fulfilled to show the world what happens to anybody who tries to cross the Rothschild family.
In 1920, Winston Churchill (whose mother was Jewish) wrote:
"From the days of Illuminati leader Weishaupt, to those of Karl Marx, to those of Trotsky, this worldwide conspiracy has been steadily growing. And now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America, have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and become the undisputed masters of that enormous empire."
A Russian leader has defied the international community again.
Will the
"band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America"
again grip
"the Russian people by the hair of their heads"
Time will tell
In 1815, Nathan Mayer Rothschild controlled the Bank of England and by the end of the century, the Rothchild family had established privately owned central banks in most major capitals. This period was known as "The Age of the Rothschilds" and it is estimated that they controlled half the wealth of the world.
Labels:
Abraham Lincoln,
Civil War,
communism,
Congress of Vienna,
Conspiracy,
Nathan Mayer Rothchilds,
New World Order,
Putin,
Russia,
Russian Revolution,
Tsar of Russia,
USA,
world government
Tuesday, 19 August 2014
An International Conspiracy
The Federal Reserve Act was passed Congress in 1913 and it established a privately owned central bank in the USA called The Federal Reserve. It had the power to issue currency and charge interest but it was only introduced after a very long campaign.
One of the founders of the House of Rothchild, Mayer Anselm Rothschild said in 1790:
“Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws...”
President Andrew Jackson knew that a privately owned central bank would work against the interests of ordinary people and for the benefit of a wealthy few so he refused to renew the charter of an earlier version of the central bank. He was the subject of a unsuccessful assassination attempt in 1836
President Abraham Lincoln printed his own currency (called Greenbacks) after the banks tried to charge him exorbitant rates of interest during the Civil War. He used the money to defend the Union by financing the war effort against the South.
The Times newspaper based in London printed:
“If that mischievous financial policy, which had its origin in the North American Republic, should become indurated down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without a debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the history of the civilized governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North America. That government must be destroyed, or it will destroy every monarchy on the globe.”
It has been estimated that President Lincoln's policies have saved the USA about $4 billion in interest payments alone. They were only implemented for a brief period of time and this gives an indication of how much the USA owes as a nation and how much interest has actually been paid.
If President Lincoln's policies had continued, would the predictions made in The Times newspaper have come true? Would the USA be a debt-free nation? Would it be the most prosperous nation in the world?
The Bankers understood at the time and understand now that the only real threat to their power is sovereign governments printing interest free and debt free money. It would break their power.
One of the founders of the House of Rothchild, Mayer Anselm Rothschild said in 1790:
“Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws...”
President Andrew Jackson knew that a privately owned central bank would work against the interests of ordinary people and for the benefit of a wealthy few so he refused to renew the charter of an earlier version of the central bank. He was the subject of a unsuccessful assassination attempt in 1836
President Abraham Lincoln printed his own currency (called Greenbacks) after the banks tried to charge him exorbitant rates of interest during the Civil War. He used the money to defend the Union by financing the war effort against the South.
The Times newspaper based in London printed:
Soon after, the British Government began to actively support the South.
Were the British Government controlled by the bankers? Did the bankers control the media?Was there an international conspiracy?
President Lincoln eventually led the Union forces to victory against the South but he was assassinated in 1865. His currency was withdrawn and Congress passed the National Banking Act which provided for privately owned banks able to issue their currency and charge whatever interest they liked
It has been estimated that President Lincoln's policies have saved the USA about $4 billion in interest payments alone. They were only implemented for a brief period of time and this gives an indication of how much the USA owes as a nation and how much interest has actually been paid.
If President Lincoln's policies had continued, would the predictions made in The Times newspaper have come true? Would the USA be a debt-free nation? Would it be the most prosperous nation in the world?
The Bankers understood at the time and understand now that the only real threat to their power is sovereign governments printing interest free and debt free money. It would break their power.
The National Banking Act led to The Federal Reserve Act being passed. Congress gave up Its power to create its own money and gave it to the Bankers who called themselves the Federal Reserve. They now had what they wanted, the power to control the government by controlling the creation of the money.
President John F Kennedy started to undermine the Federal Reserve and began the process of printing his own currency for the benefit of ordinary people. He was assassinated in 1963.
Three Presidents trying to reduce the power of the banks. Three assassination attempts, two dead Presidents. Is this a coincidence?
President John F Kennedy started to undermine the Federal Reserve and began the process of printing his own currency for the benefit of ordinary people. He was assassinated in 1963.
Three Presidents trying to reduce the power of the banks. Three assassination attempts, two dead Presidents. Is this a coincidence?
The USA is only one country. Throughout the world, the vast majority of sovereign nations have their money controlled by privately owned central banks. Do these bankers work together? Is there an international conspiracy?
It 2003, it was reported that only seven nations remained without a privately owned central bank. They were named as Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Cuba and Libya. A USA led coalition invaded Iraq and Afghanistan soon after and also led military action against Libya in 2011. Who makes these decisions? Who will be next?
Monday, 16 June 2014
A Possible New World Order
There are two fundamental ways to look at history. We can view history as a series of unrelated accidents or as a series of planned events often called conspiracies.
President F.D. Roosevelt expressed a view that history is often planned in advance and Secretary of State William Jennings Bryan was very suspicious about the motives of large financial institutions.
Major General Smedley Butler was the most decorated marine in U.S. history and he described fighting for the banks in Mexico, Cuba, Haiti and China amongst other places.
“I spent 33 years and four months in active military service and during that period I spent most of my time as a high-class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism."
Secretary of State Dr Henry Kissinger described soldiers as:-
“nothing but dogs to serve our needs.”
John Perkins describes in his book "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man" how the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (I.M.F.) use loans to generate profit for big business. Independent, sovereign nation states are saddled with huge debts and as a result are easily intimidated and manipulated.
It is not surprising that ex-military leaders such as Robert McNamara and Paul Wolfowitz became leaders of the World Bank. Nations with large debts are easily pressured into joining coalitions such as the one that invaded Iraq. Nations with large debts are easily persuaded to allow the presence of U.S. military bases on their soil. Any country that refuses to cooperate is dealt with by the CIA who ensure that U.S. political will prevails through coups or military action if necessary.
President George W. Bush ordered the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan on the basis of lies. What were his motives? He certainly didn't suffer the consequences of his actions but many thousands of innocent people died. Who was he working for?
When visiting military hospitals, President Bush was rude to those injured and maimed “fighting for our freedoms” and showed indifference to their plight. It's very obvious where his loyalties lay
Is it possible that past and current world events are not simply circumstantial?
Is there a group of world leaders, mainly unseen and unknown, who manipulate events behind the scenes to suit their own needs?
Where will it end? Possibly, the ultimate goal is to establish dictatorial control over the world and establish a new world order. We should be very suspicious
Superpaulia
Superpaulia
Friday, 13 June 2014
Looking at History in Different Ways
We can look at history in two different ways.
We can take an accidental view and look at history as a series of catastrophes. We are always led to believe that historical events like wars and revolutions were the result of some sudden event (or sequence of events) and while this might work for volcanoes and earthquakes, it does not always provide a realistic explanation of events influenced by human beings.
Alternatively, we can study history as a series of conspiracies occurring as a product of advanced planning. A conspiratorial view of history assumes that events involving the relationship between human beings (and groups of human beings) including wars and revolutions, occur as direct result of plans made in secret. This conspiratorial view does not work for volcanoes and earthquakes but it could provide a realistic explanation of the relationship between human beings and nation states.
It is possible to analyse major historical events using these two alternative schools of thought.
Traditionally, historical events are explained as accidents. A war begins when a hostile nation invades the territory of another. A revolution begins when the people (always spontaneously) rise up to overthrow an existing government. A depression occurs when the markets take an unexpected downturn. Inflation occurs when prices are driven up by shortages.
These official explanations often present difficulties for a serious analytical mind but is it really possible that government leaders could plan events and manipulate them to reach a conclusion of their choice? Is it really possible that some of the great catastrophes of history were part of a plan?
Franklin D. Roosevelt, as US President, was certainly involved in and made a big contribution during turbulent times. He has been quoted as saying:
“In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, it was planned that way”
William Jennings Bryan was US Secretary of State just before World War 1. He wrote:
“…the large banking interests were deeply interested in the world war because of the wide opportunities for large profits.”
Throughout the world, people are starting to realise that there is an indisputable link between industry and Wall Street which has been in existence for many, many years. Banks always profit from wars and have always profited from wars because debt created out of necessity in times of need results in on-going profit for years to come. Wars have always been used to help industry and commerce gain access to new commercial markets.
The Bible takes a conspiratorial view of history. Psalms 2 is a good example of conspiring men with ulterior motives
Unfortunately, education systems throughout the Western world always teach the accidental view of history without question. An alternative opinion is rarely presented and this subjective point of view is reinforced on a daily basis by most media outlets. As a result, when faced with exposure to the conspiratorial point of view the immediate reaction is profound shock. This is usually followed by disbelief, denial and a refusal to accept anything other than the propaganda they’ve been taught to believe.
Maybe world events do not happen as a series of accidents. Maybe events are the result of an organised campaign by an elite group of unseen, unknown world leaders. Maybe a mixture of accidents and conspiracies can explain historical events but we should all think for ourselves and keep an open mind
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)